金牌调解

前绿党议员涉嫌行窃案:警方上门调查_我的网站

时间都去哪了

一 |     Renee 综合          据英文《先驱报》报道,警方今天去了前绿党议员Golriz Ghahraman的家,作为对其三项入店行窃指控的调查的一部分。    NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。         Advertise with us          两名警探短暂前往了这名前议员的家,他们在敲门后没有得到回应,很快就离开了。

二 |          警方是在下午4点半左右去的,期间没有对媒体发表讲话。

三 |          图片来源:NZ Herald / George Block          目前尚不清楚Ghahraman是否住在她于2022年购买的这套房子里。在警探到达前,一名送货司机送来了一瓶葡萄酒,但还没有人从门口台阶上取走。         警方表示,他们正在调查这三起涉嫌入店行窃事件,其中两起发生在奥克兰Ponsonby的精品店Scotties Boutique,另一起发生在惠灵顿高端商店Cre8iveworx。

四 |          今天,Ghahraman辞去了国会议员的职务。她在声明中表示,她的心理健康受到了议员工作压力的“严重影响”,导致她的行为方式完全不符合她的性格。         “我并不是在为自己的行为找借口,但我确实希望解释一下。”          “我辜负了很多人,非常抱歉!”她说。         Ghahraman从心理健康的角度解释她出了什么问题。         “人们理所当然地期望他们选出的代表有最高的行为标准。我未能达到这个标准。

五 | 我很抱歉。

六 | 这是我无法解释的行为,因为它在任何方面都是不理智的。

七 | 在经过医学评估后,我意识到自己不太好。我看的心理健康专家说,我最近的行为与近来发生的导致紧张反应的事件,以及与以前未被认识到的创伤有关。”          “我不想以我的心理健康问题为借口,我为我的行为承担全部责任,我对此非常后悔。

八 | ”          “我让很多人失望了,我很抱歉。

九 | 对我的心理健康来说,最好的办法就是辞去国会议员的职务,专注于我的康复,并寻找其他方式为世界带来积极的变化。”          图片来源:NZ Herald          在从政之前,Ghahraman是一名人权律师,也是第一位有难民背景的国会议员。

十 |          在2023年的大选中,Ghahraman在绿党的名单上排名第七。

十一 |          她在绿党负责的事务包括司法、外交、国防、少数族裔社区和贸易。         2020年初,Ghahraman公开了她多发性硬化症的诊断。她在TV3的The Project节目上说,两年前她得知了自己的病情,当时她一只眼睛开始失明。她说她正在服用“强效药物”,每六个月必须去一次医院。         相关阅读:          涉嫌多次行窃的绿党议员从国会辞职:“我辜负了很多人,非常抱歉!”          绿党议员涉嫌第三起偷窃事件!这次发生在惠灵顿          涉嫌偷窃的绿党议员,今天回新西兰了,结果……          毁三观!新西兰知名国会议员第二起偷窃事件曝光!党魁发布声明!          第二起商店行窃事件被披露,绿党议员四面楚歌          知名绿党议员被指控行窃后保持沉默,政治评论员称很难重建声誉          【先驱自媒】震惊!新西兰国会议员被指控在奥克兰精品店行窃!          从伊朗难民到新西兰国会议员,年仅35的她经历了怎样开挂的人生?          她是新西兰首位难民国会议员 却不幸罹患多发性硬化          注:本文为编译/原创,欢迎转发分享;但严禁复制等未经授权的非法使用。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其相关法律责任。使用授权请联系[email protected]。         chineseherald.co.nz All Rights Reserved 版权所有          (责编:twinkle)          相关内容                颤抖吧!新西兰电动车主要多交钱了!从4月起开始……           涉嫌多次行窃的绿党议员从国会辞职:“我辜负了很多人,非常抱歉!”           奥克兰东部铁路线重新开放,但西线和南线马上要开始施工了           绿党议员涉嫌第三起偷窃事件!这次发生在惠灵顿           涉嫌偷窃的绿党议员,今天回新西兰了,结果……           一海外游客在公路上逆行10分钟后,迎面撞上一辆汽车,被控危险驾驶           2023年有多少条蛇溜过了新西兰边境?           疫情通报:病例数上升!过去一周新西兰新增8040例。

Current article:http://24bgi.wenwancaomohenenqiongpangshun.bond/0561v/57ju4.html

Published on:00:00:00


关于我的网站 | 我的网站动态 | 联系我们 | 法律声明 | 我的网站员工 | 我的网站邮箱 | 网站地图

我的网站版权所有